Menu Content/Inhalt
Home





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Latest Puzzles








iPing-it!

Webfeed (RSS/ATOM/RDF) registered at http://www.feeds4all.com

British Blog Directory.

Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service.

 

Diana's First Private Secretary Recalls Royal Life PDF Print E-mail
Written by Joanne Leyland   
Tuesday, 10 October 2006

On July 31st 1981, Buckingham Palace announced that Mr Oliver Everett was to be the 20-year-old Princess of Wales' Private Secretary and comptroller of the future King and Queen's household.

Twenty-five years later, unlike so many who surrounded Diana, the loyal aide refuses to speak at length about his royal boss, saying only of the Waleses marriage: "I was there right at the beginning when everything was fine. They were setting up the house, the family was starting.”

"The thing that remains from that time is Highgrove. Charles is a great country person. He adores his estates."



Although not willing to speak about the private machinations surrounding Charles and Diana — it was claimed at the height of the 'War of The Waleses' that the Princess tried to take control of the happily married father of four and, when he refused, according to onlookers she "spat him out like a pip" — Everett is happy to praise the many good works undertaken by the future King.

He also condemns the media's portrayal of the Prince as eccentric, saying: "It is a totally spurious view set up by journalists. It is out of date. His work at last is beginning to be respected."

In his interview with the Richmond Times-Dispatch, it is the history of the monarchy long before the days of the Charles and Diana soap opera which continues to fascinate 63-year-old Everett. Following seven years working in the Royal Library at Windsor Castle, Everett is perfectly placed to speak at length on a subject for which he is clearly passionate: the royal art collection.

Of especial interest is the life of one of Prince Charles' favourite ancestors, King George III, the man whose actions lost Britain the American colonies.

Like the Prince, Everett is convinced that the King wasn't 'mad', simply ill, explaining: "It's likely that George was suffering from a blood disorder called porphyria, which could be treated successfully today. And the Revolution was Parliament’s fault. Parliament calls the shots, and the prime minister. You can’t actually hold the monarch responsible. George III was following the will of Parliament."

The loyal aide was on duty at Windsor Castle on the morning of November 20th 1992 — the day on which the Queen and Prince Philip were supposed to be quietly celebrating their 45th wedding anniversary — when the fire took hold, threatening to destroy some of the most precious and priceless artworks in the Royal Collection, as well as the Castle itself.

Explains Everett: "We got all the Old Master drawings out and about half the books out. The book part is not the most important part of the library...By 4:30pm we were told that the fire would not reach the library, and we put them back."

Today, with Windsor restored to all its glory and the Prince of Wales now, in Everett's words, a "happily married man", the former librarian and assistant keeper of the Royal Archives has gone on to pastures new, lecturing on a subject which clearly enthralls him.

This week (Wednesday) sees him in America for a lecture in Richmond entitled 'Treasures and Curiosities from the Royal Library at Windsor Castle'.



Unfortunately, for the man who saw first hand the inner sanctum of royal life, it is the 'curiosities' which surround the present day Royal Family which will continue to intrigue a large majority of his audience.

For more details on Oliver Everett's lecture in Richmond, Virginia, please visit The Virginia Historical Society's official website.

Comment on this article
Leave your comments (Show/Hide Form)
Other Visitors Comments

Name: Exploora Comment:
I think the title shows how conditioned we are. We just assume that every book written by the royal hired help, crosses personal boundaries.

I think the title was a very good choice, because I enjoy paradox, and feel enriched when I gain unexpected insight into myself.

I think if I had been a princess or prince, I would be using a computer system instead of a personal secretary.

Often people who feel alone talk too much, hoping someone will ease their pain. I don't think it isn't being paranoid to be distrustful of people.

Of course if Princess Di had been as distrustful as I have been accused of being, and kept her feelings to herself, the book industry would not be the same as it is today.

But I think to be royal, one needs not only a stiff upper lip, but a zippered one too.
IP Logged as: 172.192.44.104 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98) Dated: 2007-03-10 22:47:02 Report This Comment

Name: Trudie Comment:
Joanne your right this is the only person associated with Diana who has never spoken about her nor has written a book. All the others simply wanted to make a fast fortune at her expense. At least Everett is lecturing on the Royal library and what it is about kudos to him.thumbsup
IP Logged as: 69.120.236.243 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Dated: 2007-03-10 11:16:13 Report This Comment

Name: Joanne Comment:
To be fair, I did stipulate on the front page that Oliver Everett hadn't said anything of great insight into the modern day royals.

The reason I chose that headline was purely to clarify the fact that this was referring to Everett as opposed to, for instance, Patrick Jephson or one of those who has already spoken about the late Princess.

Personally I just thought it interesting to see that there continues to be at least one former Diana aide who has stayed relatively tight-lipped, plus it's interesting to see what people such as Everett are doing today.

Joanne
IP Logged as: 82.42.207.74 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/418 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/417.9.2 Dated: 2007-03-09 21:48:01 Report This Comment

Name: M-M Comment:
This article has very little to do with Diana .
IP Logged as: 220.237.128.72 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Dated: 2007-03-09 20:58:42 Report This Comment

Name: Joanne Comment:
Hi Rae.

Sorry it's probably how I've written it, I didn't realise it could be misinterpreted: it was the claim which was made at the time of the 'War of the Waleses', not the actual behaviour.

Everett left royal service in 1985 but the story about Diana came to light in 1992.

Joanne
IP Logged as: 82.42.207.74 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/418 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/417.9.2 Dated: 2007-03-09 18:05:00 Report This Comment

Name: Rae Comment:
"it was claimed at the height of the 'War of The Waleses' that the Princess tried to take control of the happily married father of four and, when he refused, according to onlookers she 'spat him out like a pip'"

Whoever claimed that should check the facts. Everett left working for Diana long before the War of the Waleses even began.
IP Logged as: 69.1.34.201 HomePage: http://www.thedianaring.com Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061003 Firefox/2.0 Dated: 2007-03-09 17:48:46 Report This Comment

 
< Prev   Next >

Videos

Quick Links

Word

Trust

Senebale

More Web Links


Syndicate