While applause greeted the arrival of the Queen and Prince Philip, a lone shout of "hypocrite" pierced through the midday air as the Prince of Wales arrived (pictured left) a short time ago at the memorial service for his ex-wife, Diana, Princess of Wales.

Cutting a solitary figure as he arrived at Guards Chapel in the grounds of Wellington Barracks, Prince Charles was greeted – as were all of the royal and Spencer family arrivals – with kisses from his sons, Prince William and Prince Harry. 22-year-old Harry is due to give a personal reading at the event.

However, the silence which otherwise greeted Charles’s arrival was distinctly shattered by a lone woman’s shout of protest from the crowds gathered behind barriers across the road from the military barracks.

Your Name:

Your Email Address:

Your Homepage:


Comment:

BOLD

"QUOTE"

UNDERLINE

Name: testimonials

Comment: Postpartum depression PPD is a condition that describes a range of physical and emotional changes that many mothers can have after having a baby. amoxicillin experience physical exhaustion tamiflu among other factors zoloft precautions when taking tramadol leading hair transplant authority valium spinal cord injury accutane threatening skin infection doxycycline other services provided meridia prescription meds online

Name: fekkekhws	Comment: 9EjG1d omxonydwrqjr, hiedmuvsrhoi, [link=http://vwhqchipdukr.com/]vwhqchipdukr[/link], http://zifouhylqrni.com/

Name: ISLAMIC	Comment: Martin The body has those same warning signals. cheap auto insurance whole life insurance auto insurance unswerving loyalty between employer life insurance quotes pegate pinnacle education sonds

Name: arachnid-web	Comment: As a result weight-loss surgeons will look for patients with a BMI of at least 40 or a body weight at least 100 pounds over ideal weight. homeowners insurance offer data security consultation auto insurance positions with minimum home insurance titans birch carol coyle

Name: indosatgprs	Comment: In accepting Value Pharmaceuticals into its directory eDrugSearch. meridia getting enough levels xanax caregiving their elders zoloft facial rejuvenation surgery cialis writing done quicker

Name: Random	Comment: Taking double dose or extra dose will create complications as this drug deals with nervous system. prozac generally given along cialis patients about possible risks ambien thing about health viagra position with permanent stitches

Name: TicTac	Comment: Consumers may have purchased the product as baked cookies of various sizes. xanax assume that these alli clear voice transfers eliminate propecia tension headache symptoms caused doxycycline precut frozen cookie

Name: megatec	Comment: The study appears in Nature Neuroscience's advance online edition. phentermine useing special software templates prednisone erection once stimulated zoloft outflow tract obstruction propecia global wire covers

Name: mynewmeet	Comment: It is very important to report any of these symptoms to a doctor immediately or go to an emergency room for treatment. xanax through online pharmacy cialis microbial drug discovery tramadol commonly prescribed sleep medication viagra compared with untreated

Name: Ansen	Comment: Propecia gives significant results in male pattern baldness within 9 weeks of regular use. ambien sexual health seminar prednisone physician usually suggests prophylactic cialis falling property values viagra north american association

Name: eingeben	Comment: A total of 93 involved depression 32 involved panic attacks while others related to inability to sleep mood swings and tearfulness. alli actual results could differ accutane anderson cancer center ambien parameter patient monitor acomplia while many people

Name: Son	Comment: Today it is possible to treat impotence through generic drugs. levitra stage kidney disease accutane united states private tramadol seasoned world travelers cialis specific single deduction

Name: volks	Comment: Perhaps the best and most economical health insurance plan for Ohio residents would be a concept already in place. homeowners insurance former specifications after cheap auto insurance difference when insurance company health insurance quotes peter best insurance services life insurance quotes credit card accounts

Name: qqzhamq	Comment: agzYUe ydilsiqsqooe, ylkymvhkisti, [link=http://fqkmjznjxhzn.com/]fqkmjznjxhzn[/link], http://ykpctqglhwno.com/

Name: Kate

Comment: Geez!! I've missed some good times on this thread... and to think we may have had someone from Clarence house! Wow... I am sooo impressed.. So why were they here. To stir up things obviously.. Of course Camilla will go to William's wedding... Why ever not? I think we got over her attending the prince's events when she went to his graduation, right... It is Camilla's presence that is not wanted ,when the event has to do with DIana, as this past memorial...That will always be!

Name: shelley	Comment: "Girls" I fear we are arguing, for the most part, here with the same person. Enough said.

Name: pipsqueak	Comment: It was so moving to see Harry go public with his love and dotage of his mother. " When she was alive we completely took for granted her unrivalled love of life, laughter, fun and folly. She was our guardian, friend and protector."

Name: Rae	Comment: Oh, wait! I stand corrected. The only person on here suggesting that Camilla shouldn't be invited to William's wedding ISN'T Thomas...it's J. Parker himself. Who is now arguing with himself. Carry on, J. Parker.

Name: Monika	Comment: This is too funny! Clearly, the decisions and events of the past week have starched some knickers.

Name: Rae

Comment: J. Parker, the only one here who says that Camilla shouldn't go to William's wedding is your good buddy. Thomas. Whom I'm sure that we'll be hearing from shortly, since you two are working in tandem. Who is Clarence? Oh, wait, you mean Thomas is supposedly a Clarence House courtier? Snort. Perhaps the POW should advise his staff to actually do their work instead of posting on Internet sites.

Name: J. Parker

Comment: Thomas is entirely right in his description of you. If you think my stating below that for all her flaws, Diana was in fact a *better* mother than HM, you do have problems. I will copy them again here. I hope Thomas you advise Clarence to observe the irrational vitriol on this site, and that under the circumstances, never, ever give in to the mob; stand united together. If Prince William invites Camilla to his wedding she should go, and damn what anyone else thinks. Even Diana, I trust, would not deny the Duchess of Cornwall that. William loves his father and would not wish to be set against him. Camilla should be allowed to attend family functions. Goodbye, I depart. # # # # # # # # # Without a united, strong family, there will never be a strong Monarchy, and HM fails to comprehend this. In fact, would have the late Princess of Wales done to either William or Harry what HM did to Charles? Is there any doubt who was the better mother, for all her flaws? Or that Diana was right to be appalled by her coldness? Thomas, perhaps you can communicate to any of them to 'see the light', that without a united loving family the Monarchy is pointless.

Name: Laura	Comment: Well spotted Rae! And yes indeed it's very odd indeed! Monika, you've given me food for thought there!

Name: Rae	Comment: Monika, I get what you are saying. And it's even odder that the two of them keep showing up within minutes of each other. Isn't it too bad that they just can't let it all go? 25 years from now, they'll still be citing the same old events, etc.

Name: Monika	Comment: Laura & Rae, Do either of you find it odd that someone with such anti-Diana opinions made a "sudden" guest appearance on this site, YET they spoke to us "girls" as if they have been with us for quite a while. Surely someone like that would have spoken up before. Read into that what you wish...

Name: J. Parker	Comment: Monica, no, I'm hugging Rottweilers and bringing lambs to the slaughter. And kicking hornets nests -- appears I struck a nerve. This isn't my fight, anyway. And it's not yours. If Diana is at peace, her soul wouldn't want a cult, which your remarks in fact verify.

Name: Thomas

Comment: The idea that members of the British Royal Family have "fans" points up the problem of so many of these posts: and especially those of a dead, FORMER member, who in her lifetime did her best to damage an institution that made her into an international "star". Watching a half-hour or so of the Settelin tapes on the "Women's Entertainment" network, proved to me what I thought of her when I spent time in London in the mid-80s (and heard what was going on). My big question was, after she had been caught lying to her husband, mother-in-law, and Prime Minister in the summer of 1992, why didn't she just get out? Victimhood and the martyr's status, I suspect,were more comfortable. Fact is, she never solved her deepest problems, never took responsibility for her own actions and went from a disastrous book to a disastrous tv interview, the two "nails in her coffin" (the words of an aide at BP) that lead directly to the Alma tunnel. Her choices, her actions, her death...I call you "girls" because so many of you(not all) act like teenagers discussing rock stars.What you can't see is that this attitude (the celebritization of the RF) will lead to the demise of the institution. Your beloved Wills will probably never be king. I noted with amusement that on the GOOGLE News page, all the Diana news is listed under "Entertainment"..a good place for it, as I'm afraid that's what it is for so many of you. Sad thing is, you'll probably just keep nattering away at each other but it all has no effect on what the members of the Royal Family have to do in their public work for their country...and that includes the heir to the Throne and his wife. To paraphrase what the Ferguson woman said on Larry King show you " just don't get it" like the late Diana Spencer herself.

Name: Muriel

Comment: Ladies and gentlemen, can we please just stop this. No one should question anyone's right to visit this site, and I am not. Nor am I questioning your genuine affection for Diana. But there have been those that have intimated that we who like Charles and Camilla have questionable moral values, that there must be something wrong with us. Some have judged Charles and Camilla as having no value as human beings. We all have value, each and every one of us, even Charles and Camilla. They feel pain and heartache the same way we do, the same way Diana did. They too, grieved for Diana, no one wanted to see what happened happen. They shared the pain of her children, they are after all, his sons too. They asked for forgiveness, I believe the Lord granted it, and they have found happiness together. We'll never know if Diana would have, I hope that she would have. Her life was cut short, and that is tragic, but it can't be undone. I don't think it's fitting to make a battleground out of her memory instead of honoring it. What say you?

Name: Laura

Comment: Like I said Muriel I wasn't trying to push anyone out at all. I just objected to a someone comeing on her, persuming it's their right to aim names at me and other posters. It was the rudeness Thomas and J Parker showed and not what they were saying that was the problem. Just goes to show one thing though. 'Those Charles' fans can behave just as badly and in the same way they criticise 'these Diana' fans for behaving.

Name: Muriel	Comment: Valmae is right, this site isn't called the Diana Site! I'm not going to be pushed out either!

Name: Rae	Comment: No, Valmae, what we "Diana fans" were asking for was a day to remember Diana without any of the usual bitching. WHY was that so much to ask for?

Name: Laura

Comment: Valmae, I take your 'my my comment' was directed at me asking why Thomas and J Parker were even here, so I will answer your point. I have no objection to anyone being here, no objection to one disagreeing with me. However, both J Parker and Thomas deliberately have come on here to be rude, using terms such as 'Diana-maniacs' accusing us of being members of a 'cult' and being 'blind supporters'. Well if someone is going to call names such as these then we have a right to reply to them. And no, I dont believe I can tell people to leave 'on a whim' I was merely questioning the character of someone who comes onto these sorts of boards and feel fit to judge people s/he does not know, ususaly appaling names. Who does he think he is to think he can do that and not be replied to?

Name: Rae	Comment: No, J Parker, it isn't too hard to have. All YOU had to do was shut up. The boys were right in inviting Camilla, she was right in declining the invitation. The service is now over. So, let it go already. It was an inappropriate time and occasion to heckle anyone.

Name: valmae	Comment: My, my that's always the answer. Joanne - these Diana fans seem to think they have taken the site over and therefore, at a whim, can ask anybody to leave. I've had it many, many times. Guess, what I'm still here and will remain.

Name: Claire

Comment: Actually it's the people who are pro Charles and CPB who keep up the battles. Those people never cease to amze me when the only argument they can dig up is to attempt to continue to blame Diana for the mess that is Charles and CPB. They are always the first to drag Diana into any argument in an attempt to change the line of discussion so that the bad light that shines on the latest debacle surrounding Charles and CPB will then be changed into a battle about Diana. Ten years later pro Charles and CPB followers still always blame Diana no matter what. It's Diana's fault that the POW has said something stupid yet again...and it's Diana's fault that CPB has yet to do anything in a positive way to support the monarchy. I think that the Charles and CPB followers should attempt to make a positive case for their heros on their own merit and without dragging Diana into every single discussion. I fear that they don't have much to work with so all they can do is blame others.Let go of your hate and jealousy and leave Diana alone. Talk about Charles and CPB without having to besmirk Diana...I don't think you'll have much of a discussion without the daily trashing of Diana in order to boost Charles and CPB

Name: Laura	Comment: Well J.Parker and Thomas for that matter, if you find us Diana fans so abhorant I do wonder what on earth your doing here. And if you can't leave off the bitching for a single day, in order for us Diana fans to remember the Princess then really, you do need to get a life beyond the computer.

Name: exploora	Comment: I can't believe this went on for ten years. I think it will take alot more than just a pleading and prayer from the ArchBishop of London. It will probably take divine intervention and the seizing of book contracts.

Name: Emma Thomas	Comment: The sooner this country becomes a republic, the better. Diana was our one hope of losing the chinless wonders from the aristocracy and bringing some humanity in. The monarchy died the day she did.

Name: M-M

Comment: Oh dear , Thomas and J Parker what can a person say to such opinions ? Most of them seem to start off with 'You girls'.... ! Charles lost his most important battle when he married Camilla IMO . If you are C/H staffers you will know that . That fact has skewed everything . All his and his staff's efforts since then have been to try to make people accept her , and not only that , to accord to her ( unearned ) all the feelings they had for Diana . It won't happen , tolerance is the most he will get , he should have saved his efforts for other more achievable things . The Memorial Service went off very well , in spite of the POW's meddling , and that was mainly because Camilla withdrew her most inappropriate presence from it . Rosa Monckton has not always had complimentary things to say about her friend Diana , but in this case what she said was spot on . The Queen has acted most correctly and indeed graciously in advising Camilla not to attend and in seeing that there was a very large Royal turn out for the Memorial service . I'm sure she was proud of her grandsons

Name: Monika

Comment: J.Parker, did you take a break from kicking puppies and babies to join us today? Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but the joy with which you have posted your mean-spirited comments makes me pity you more than anything else. People who are happy in their personal life do not get such immense joy from dancing on another's grave. If this makes your day, then I feel sorry for you. JUST MY OPINION, but to all the regulars on here, I would not waste my keystrokes on this coward who is clearly stirring the pot in a desperate cry for attention...the sickest kind.

Name: J. Parker

Comment: It's a new day, and just wondering, in case Joanne chooses not to post my reply to Laura, if you girls have seen this site? http://members4.boardhost.com/ CronePrincess/index.html?1186941157 And this post: http://members4.boardhost.com/ CronePrincess/msg/1188500272.html Posted by Martha on August 30, 2007, 2:57 pm, in reply to "Sorry, but Camilla SHOULD be going to the service" "The best way, indeed the only way, to preserve her memory is to stop fighting old battles over her corpse while claiming to know what she would think if she were around today." Bingo. While Paul Burrell and Rosa Monckton lay claim to being Diana's voice from beyond the grave, I have to ask myself what Diana would think about all this kerfuffle. This ten-year memorial should be to honor Diana's contributions and to remember her well. It has turned into an opportunity for the opportunists to elbow past each other to position themselves in front of the cameras as they extend their long-expired fifteen minutes and promote themselves once again in the glow of Diana's celebrity." I notice there has been no discussion about whether or not the ex-wives of Oliver Hoare or Will Carling should or should not be invited. Or the surviving family of Barry Manakee. Did Dr. Hasnat Khan receive an invitation? James Gilbey? Will we hear another stirring speech on family values and morality from Earl Spencer?

Name: Rae	Comment: Amen to that, Laura!

Name: J. Parker

Comment: Yes, Laura, it is too hard to have, and sadly, that is part of the legacy, light and darkness, of the late Princess of Wales. I am not commenting on the thread or post about Harry's tribute to his mother. I am commenting on the story 'solitary voice heckles Charles'. If you want to read 'toe curling' posts, there are several in today's Guardian again questioning Prince Harry's parentage! Charles is the sole living parent of the boys. The boys are adult men; they asked Camilla to be at the service. And look at how things have ended up. Cal Thomas' words are about the cult, not the Princess. And I stand by my statement that today, in a moment of reflection and thinking about life, death, and the sacred (unless one is an atheist), considering idolatry is entirely relevant. Then again, so is free will. Adios!

Name: Laura	Comment: J.Parker, the point we are making is, just for one day we want to remember Diana for who she was, what she did, what she achieved in life etc. We want a day off from people slagging off Diana and just a simple day remembering her life on the tenth anniversary of her passing. Is that too hard to have?

Name: J. Parker

Comment: Monika, the last comment, written by Cal Thomas, is appropriate today -- I think Diana, now most of all, today, would want her 'blind' supporters to know the truth and move on, and not commit mayhem and strife in her *name*! I think she'd feel sad, in an enlightened state, and find it pitiable that there is a 'cult' and the strife and division continues, to the detriment of her sons, and their, sadly, only living parent, HRH Prince Charles.

Name: J. Parker

Comment: Thomas, Your comments about Christianity are well taken, and I'll provide a link to the BBC site that has the text of the brilliant words of Bishop Chartres in full: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6972422.stm Yet I fear and suspect that HRH Prince Charles gave in to pressure mostly from HM Queen Elizabeth II, who in turn showed terrible judgement in giving in to Ms. Rosa Monckton's vitriolic and baseless essay, when from a number of sources, including true friends of Diana, it is known that she did in fact want Charles to marry Camilla and 'make an honest woman of her' Furthermore, her remarks about Bishop Chartres and the chattels should not have been made on the eve of a memorial service. I have no access to Ms. Monckton's essay but today's Guardian states: 'It is organised not according to what Diana would have wanted, but according to what her ex-husband wants," wrote Rosa Monckton, the princess's close friend, in a devastating article in the Mail on Sunday, credited with persuading Camilla to decide later the same day not to attend.' http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,,330658252-103573,00.html # # # I for one do not believe those statements are true. Of course, HRH Prince Charles never fights back publicly, but he lost his most important battle in not standing by his wife today, I believe. I believe HM responded conceded to public pressure and Rosa Monckton. Would she now abdicate in favor of Rosa? Why not? And I suspect Charles gave in to his mother. Before God, we are each souls -- she shall not answer as Queen, I think, but as a woman and a mother. Steve Glover wrote movingly in The Daily Mail: # # # # # # How depressing the tenth anniversary of Diana's death is becoming. I know it is not supposed to be a celebration, but surely we should hope that something positive and forwardlooking might have come out of the occasion. As it is, the dead Princess remains as divisive as ever. We do not seem to have moved on at all. For one thing, those who say that the Duchess of Cornwall should not have gone to the service tomorrow - and are therefore delighted that she has been forced to pull out - are fighting yesterday's battles. Why shouldn't she be there? Are divisions and differences to persist in death as they did in life? At most memorial services, there are a number of people present who in life were at odds in some measure with the person who died. They come in a spirit of reconciliation, even recompense. The things that set them apart in life are put on one side in death. So it should have been with Camilla and Diana. No one pretends that Camilla Parker Bowles, as she was, actively promoted Diana's marriage to Prince Charles. On the other hand, there are lots of reasons for supposing that it would have fallen apart for reasons other than their adultery. In any event, it is all long ago. # # # # # Without a united, strong family, there will never be a strong Monarchy, and HM fails to comprehend this. In fact, would have the late Princess of Wales done to either William or Harry what HM did to Charles? Is there any doubt who was the better mother, for all her flaws? Or that Diana was right to be appalled by her coldness? Thomas, perhaps you can communicate to any of them to 'see the light', that without a united loving family the Monarchy is pointless.

Name: Kate	Comment: Monika - I applaud your post to Thomas. Nicely said!

Name: Laura	Comment: Thomas, an informal pact was made on here for all claws and catty behaviour to be put aside for one day, the day of the memorial service, the day of the tenth anniversary of Diana's death. I request that you do so and discuss what you think is wrong with Diana fans another day. Thankyou.

Name: Monika

Comment: Thomas my friend, this is NOT the day for this and I would never "go there" if not for yet another of your typically rude comments that misses the point. I presume you are referring to the following words from the Bishop: "Still, 10 years after her tragic death, there are regular reports of "fury" at this or that incident, and the Princess's memory is used for scoring points. Let it end here. Let this service mark the point at which we let her rest in peace and dwell on her memory with thanksgiving and compassion." I wholeheartedly agree with allowing Diana to rest in peace and, especially, with "dwell[ing] on her memory with thanksgiving and compassion." Yes, absolutely, she deserves nothing less!! HOWEVER, those of us who understand and appreciate Diana's enormous contribution to this world, and who would like nothing more than to be able to dwell on her memory in peace, HAVE NOT BEEN PERMITTED TO DO SO because of the perpetual attempts by others to discredit her memory and edit (if not totally rewrite) history. I dream of the day we are free to celebrate her life without mud being thrown by those who do not share the same opinion. Now THAT would be "Christian." And on that note, Thomas, it is also Christian to help a fellow man when they cannot help themselves...i.e. defending a person who is no longer here to defend themselves. I hope my comment did not offend anyone as this is truly not the day for this nonsense, but I could not NOT respond to such simple ignorance and arrogance. Enough said.

Name: exploora

Comment: I don't think the majority was thinking of this as entertainment, and I think that is why Di, meant so much to many members of the public, she showed respect to the public and to the public's collective dignity. Di appeared to draw upon our (collective we) energy, and visa versa. I have been reading Niccolo's Prince, two different translations, one is bundled with Utopia and Dr. Luther's letter to the German nobility in a rare book which is only allowed to be used as a reference book now, and as you know Niccolo, More or Dr. Luther did not use one swear word when they were expressing their disppointment in the world as they knew it in the 1500's. Anyway, speaking from the heart can say a lot more than words can, so much gets lost in the translation, as I found when reading the two different copies of Niccolo's Prince. The lesson I think I learned is how people when they believe in the something, can become one, they can unite without fighting, hurting each other, and hitting each other over the head. Di appeared to know that. And of course we all know about the doubting Thomases in our mist. Doubt can only test our faith, and then doubt can make our faith stronger. We don't have to explain that to anyone, especially not a doubting Thomas.

Name: Laura

Comment: I think Harry's speech, which included references to his father, is a testament to how well Diana and Charles brought their children up. I am sure if Diana were looking down on William and Harry she'd be bursting with pride at how much her sons have grown up and how well they represent their mother. I think if Diana had survived the crash, she's still be hugging and kissing them and would still be 'the worlds best mother' to them!

Name: valmae

Comment: To me one fact shone through, the Princes love their mother and love their father. She died loving them and their father deeply loves them. The same applies to their grandparents and both families. The Queen was quoted as saying the Prince had tried to give them enough love for two parents over the past 10 years. We are all onlookers What has happened in the media (of all kinds) is to be regretted.

Name: Thomas

Comment: Did any of you actually LISTEN to the words of the Bishop? Re-read them, and carefully, on the Daily Telegraph website. And any of you claiming to be Christian, did YOU listen?? A memorial service is not meant to be entertainment for the masses. Shame on you for your judgmental hypocrisy...the Royal Family have, pretty obviously, all moved on, too bad most of the Diana-maniacs cannot. No matter, it means nothing.

Name: Monika	Comment: Laura, you are absolutely correct and I agree with you. I only meant that it didn't surprise me that someone felt strongly enough to do that. J. Parker, the last paragraph in your post was not needed today.

Name: Rebekah	Comment: Hopefully the heckler's comment won't encourage the Royals to keep future events private. It was wonderful for William and Harry to share this event with the public. Shame on the heckler.

Name: Laura

Comment: Although the word 'hypocrite' being shouted out was hardly shocking, and I expect a lot worse could of been shouted, I just found it highly disrespectful to the memory of Diana. There are times and places for that sort of behaviour. If the woman who shouted it out really thought anything of Diana she would of realised that William and Harry, the love and light of Diana's life had enough to deal with today as well as having to hear that being shouted out. Instead of shouting out words and offending Prince Harry (I'm sure William heard it too but he was off camera at the time) she would of been better venturing down to Kensington Palace and letting off steam to the reporters there. This was a memorial service and not the place for such behaviour. Only my opinion though.

Name: Monika

Comment: I hope to watch it again on CSPAN this evening. I was frustrated by all the commentators speaking over everyone. While I regret that Harry and William (and only they!) suffered at the heckler's comment, it's hardly shocking. CH (C&C) tried to hijack this memorial but, in the end, one was sent packing and the other's presence was barely tolerated. Harry was terrific and he had me in tears. I only hope he heard the applause from outside. I'm glad he sat with the Spencers..that was a nice touch.

Name: colleen gagnon

Comment: I was up at four to watch it live CBC has been rerunning it in segments all this morning will rerun completely again at 5 pacific 8pm eastern Canada always has wonderful coverage on all things Royal. I thought the memorial beautiful how handsome her boys looked and Harry a real star. I still wonder about Charles and really wonder what his thoughts are about Diana realizing now how well thought of she was and the wonderful things said about her. Any Love or any regrets.

Name: Kate

Comment: You know, these past few months, with the pending memorial service for Diana and the issue of whether Camilla will be present or not, did reach a feverish pitch... Now that it has happened AND Camilla DID NOT attend, and the Memorial itself appears to have gone very well, it will be good to get away from the topic for awhile.. Although I never liked how the RF handled Diana in life or death, it has always been Charles and Camilla, whom I did/do not respect nor admire nor think are role models for the positions of King and Queen.Their actions for the past 3 decades are not very impressive in my view. However, he was born to be king, so let's get on with it.. I'm sure his reign will be short, and for that I am thankful. Following the Queen and Prince Phillip and the younger royals , I am sure will be interesting.. Diana R.I.P...

Name: J. Parker

Comment: I believe Prince Charles had no business at this service, for in truth the wife he placed on the cross today was his second, Camilla. The memorial should have been private for the families, the Windsors & Spencers. What a catastrophe! The Bishop of London, the Right Reverend Richard Chartres, called for rumours about the princess to end. "Still ten years after her death the princess’s memory… is used for scoring points," he said. "Let it end here. Let this service mark the point at which we let her rest in peace." From your lips to God's ears, I pray! Cal Thomas wrote brilliantly in The International Tribune: The Diana cult will continue until someone younger with a better story replaces her. The public always wants a better and younger story. Consider the musical "Chicago," when public attention and favor quickly pass from Velma Kelly to Roxie Hart and then to yet another woman with a more exciting narrative. Cults ultimately disappoint, and the Diana cult will, too. Germaine Greer concludes by writing that Diana was a "desperate woman seeking applause." No wonder so many still love her, because they are seeking the same thing.

Name: Laura

Comment: Although by no means a huge fan of Prince Charles, I though the heckling and shouting of 'hypocrite' was out of place for two reasons. Reason one: If anyone saw or is lucky to see the BBC coverage, you could plainly see the upset and hurt on Prince Harry's face when his father was heckled. He looked and appeared nervous enough, and the stupid person who shouted 'hypocrite' was not hurting Prince Charles (he is after all used to that sort of thing) but in fact was hurting the people Diana loved most in the world - her children. Reason Two: Again the reason for the memorial is lost after behaviour like this. The silence when he arrived was more then enough to make a point. I think it's the wrong time and the wrong place to make such a point and took away, IMO, the dignity of the service.

Name: Laura	Comment: Take lots of tissues with you when you hear Harry speak Kate. You'll need them! I think Diana will be bursting with pride over the memorial and her sons and the respect show through the day. God, I'm welling up here!

Name: Kate	Comment: Thanks Laura...I wish I had heard the Princes speak! I know I will heard it , likely , tonite... Diana would be so pleased for this memorial and with her handsome Sons. I think it should have happened sooner, then later, but at least it happened!

Name: Chloe	Comment: for everyone in the US who missed the service, i think CSPAN may rerun it later on tonight. i know that cnn and msnbc were doing live coverage as well.

Name: Laura	Comment: Kate, Princess Michael of Kent was in attendance, looking as glam as ever!

Name: tracie	Comment: totally disrespectful of the idiot to call out at what is meant to be time of respect especially at a memorial service. hate charles if they wish but in front of the boys who love their father and are experiencing what will be a day of reflection and emotion for their beloved late mother was unnessary.

Name: Elizabeth King

Comment: Far more telling than the shout-out of "hypocrite" by ONE visitor to the memorial, was the deafening silence of the crowd upon Prince Charles' arrival. It sat in striking contrast to the cheers for the Queen. There can be no doubt, even in the bubble Charles happily resides in, that the general public view his insistence on Camilla's attendance at the memorial as not only appalling, but also (and perhaps more importantly) as instructive of his inability to make honorable, rational decisions. Not exactly qualities that one hopes for in a future monarch.

Name: Kate

Comment: Iam soo mifted!.. Got up at 5am to watch but nothing really started til 6 am..Saw most arrive and then by 6:30 had to get ready for work and out the door by 7am, when all was just starting.. The princes looked very impressive as did the Queen and Philip. Heard the round of applause for the two.Heard NOTHING for POW! I thought I saw Prince Michael but did not see his wife! Anyway I am hoping the CBC will rerun the whole thing tonite..

Name: Mrs Coombs

Comment: In an article penned by Stephen Bates of The Guardian today, he writes of Charles: "As he takes his seat in the front pew of the Guards Chapel at Wellington barracks near Buckingham Palace this morning during the service to commemorate the 10th anniversary of his former wife Diana's death, it is just possible that the Prince of Wales may reflect lugubriously that his plans for the event have turned once more to dust and ashes." Charles hijacked the plans for the Memorial Service from the start, barely, if ever, relying upon the input of Diana's sons. So, as for the lady who called him "HYPOCRITE", her words were too kind. Charles has proven, once again, to be an opportunist, insensitive bungler. Thank You, Your Majesty, for stepping in to put it right! Rest In Peace, Dear Diana!!