Menu Content/Inhalt
Home





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Latest Puzzles






iPing-it!

Webfeed (RSS/ATOM/RDF) registered at http://www.feeds4all.com

British Blog Directory.

Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service.

 

Diana Inquest: Jurors Continue Deliberations PDF Print E-mail
Written by Joanne Leyland   
Thursday, 03 April 2008
The jury at the inquest into the deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Fayed have begun a second day of deliberations ahead of returning a verdict.

The six women and five men who will ultimately rule on how the two British citizens of the Paris crash died on August 31st 1997 were sent out shortly before 12pm on Wednesday morning, exactly six months since the exhaustive proceedings began at the High Court in London.

The jurors left Court 73 armed with large files of documents, the result of
what has been an unprecedented inquest into the death of a royal (although Diana was divorced at the time of her death she was nevertheless still the mother of a future king and his brother).



Deliberations will continue to take place between 10am and 4pm each week day, with nobody but the jurors themselves knowing how long this process will now take.

The coroner has already laid out the options open to the jury: two options of manslaughter – either caused by the actions of the paparazzi as they chased the car or by the actions of the driver, Henri Paul – an accident or unexplained.

The jury have been told that they cannot return an open verdict purely because they can’t come to agreement amongst themselves.




Perhaps most significantly, considering the sheer amount of analysis given over to this theory, Lord Justice Scott Baker has also told the jury that they cannot return a verdict which supports any of the murder conspiracy theories so vocally perpetuated by Mohamed Al Fayed.

These include the theory that Diana was murdered by MI6 on the orders of her former father-in-law, Prince Philip.

Comment on this article
Leave your comments (Show/Hide Form)
Other Visitors Comments

Name: exploora Comment:
I think so much related to the accident and beyond has been odd.

What happens if the jury members cannot agree.

Imagine if twelve of us regulars were on the jury. I wonder how long it would take us to decide a verdict. I guess I would vote for the incident being an accident due to a combined negligence of driver and paparazzi and possibly the passengers not wearing seat belts. And of course that conclusion would not fit the criteria.
IP Logged as: 207.81.187.52 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080311 Firefox/2.0.0.13 Dated: 2008-04-04 04:53:59 Report This Comment

Name: Monika Comment:
I do not believe there was a conspiracy, but I find it odd that certain options were taken off the table. And what if they really can't agree on one of the 'acceptable' verdicts? Interesting...
IP Logged as: 24.45.115.142 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Dated: 2008-04-03 23:30:51 Report This Comment

Name: Emily Elizabeth Windsor-Cragg Comment:
So, essentially the jurors have been ordered to comply with a judgment of no-fault accident.

I wonder if they will go along with the order, or rule some other way.

EEWC
IP Logged as: 75.41.58.64 HomePage: http://www.holyconservancy.org Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20071008 Ubuntu/7.10 (gutsy) Firefox/2.0.0.6 Dated: 2008-04-03 20:55:27 Report This Comment

 
< Prev   Next >

Latest Videos

Quick Links

Word

Trust

Senebale

Inspire

More Web Links


Syndicate