Menu Content/Inhalt
Home





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Latest Puzzles








iPing-it!

Webfeed (RSS/ATOM/RDF) registered at http://www.feeds4all.com

British Blog Directory.

Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service.

 

Charles & Camilla Share The Headlines With Diana (Again) PDF Print E-mail
Written by Joanne Leyland   
Wednesday, 22 March 2006
The Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall's tour of Egypt has finally received extensive coverage in the British media. But it might not be in quite the way the royal couple had hoped.



On Tuesday, TV news was primarily concerned with the condemnation by a group of British MPs of the costs and running of the Diana memorial fountain than covering the royal tour of Egypt. In comparison, Charles and Camilla's first full day in Egypt resulted in very little coverage.

It must have been music to the ears of Clarence House aides and maybe even the royal couple themselves, when they discovered the Prince and Duchess are on the front pages...that is until they realised just why Camilla is headline news back home.



Visiting the Al-Azhar temple in Cairo, Camilla respectfully dressed demurely by wearing a headscarf and a £1,500 trouser suit by her favourite designer Robinson Valentine so as to cover any bare flesh. Camilla, however, still wore red nail varnish on her toes, visible through sheer pop socks.

The image immediately drew stark comparisons with that of Diana who visited a temple in Egypt during a solo tour she made in 1992.

Worse for the royal couple: all of the papers are reminding readers just why an unhappy looking Diana was in Egypt alone — her husband Charles had gone on holiday to Turkey with a group of friends which included Camilla.



Perhaps the craziest (and most questionable, in terms of taste?) headline of the day is the front page of the Daily Star. Now I have to say, it's not a paper I myself would buy — if you're reading this in America, the Star is rather like your National Enquirer — as just look at that headline! 'Diana Ghost Has Royals By The Ghoulies'.

Although the paper dubs this a 'Royal Exclusive' (surely with tongues firmly in cheeks?) the essence of the story is exactly the same as every other newspaper's coverage: that Diana is haunting this royal tour of Egypt.



A 'senior royal aide' tells the Star: "The spirit of Diana still haunts the royal family, but especially Charles and Camilla. Whatever they do, wherever they go, whatever they wear, people will always make comparisons with Diana. Inevitably, there are a large number of people who will never believe any royal can do it as well as Princess Diana."

"Charles and Camilla can't escape. The first question anyone asks about is Diana. It's 'Diana this' and 'Diana that' for them. Camilla is her own woman and she has a big job on her hands."



Not one newspaper shows any pictures of Prince Charles, despite the fact he made a significant speech in which he criticised the offensive Danish cartoons which satirised the Prophet Mohammed.

Charles told an audience of specially invited Islamic scholars: "The recent ghastly strife and anger over the Danish cartoons shows the danger that comes of our failure to listen and to respect what is precious and sacred to others."

"In my view, the true mark of a civilised society is the respect it pays to minorities and to strangers."

However, as happened so often during his first marriage, the photographers were again more interested in Camilla. As Charles spoke, his wife was attracting attention by donning a pair of glasses — which she informed inquisitive journalists she has been "wearing for years" — for the first time in public.

Later in the day it was Charles who could have done with the spectacles as he tripped whilst climbing some steep steps. His stumble caused Camilla to wag her finger at him and joke: "You were told not to do that."

Meanwhile, Camilla is reported to have been "lost for words" but latterly "thrilled to bits" at the news that she has been named Spouse of the Year by the Oldie magazine.

Today, the Prince and his wife have been visiting a Cairo sanctuary for working horses, mules and donkeys suffering pain.

The visit brought a rather odd remark from Charles who, on seeing a donkey eating a treat offered by his wife, turned to Camilla and said: "Your first carrot, darling."

Comment on this article
Leave your comments (Show/Hide Form)
Other Visitors Comments

Name: Linda Comment:
It is very sad to see the world become so accepting of Camilla (including Diana's sons). She does not deserve anything for being a home wrecker who thought so little of herself that she was willing to be with someone else's husband for all those years and to cheat on her own husband for the life of that marriage.

I wonder, who does she pray to if she prays at all? And how can she look those two boys in the eye?
IP Logged as: 199.80.117.31 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Dated: 2006-03-29 20:09:58 Report This Comment

Name: Hazel Comment:
Unfortunately after reading all comments I find myself unable to resist sharing my 2 cents.

To begin with, during her lifetime I have never had any interest in anything Diana was doing. I must confess it was even mildly irritating that a day wouldn't pass in every newspaper that they would miss reporting on her.

However I was still awake at the night she died and the running news sent a chill through my spine. Pictures of her while still "dating" Charles or from the wedding day - I was dumbstruck to discover that she was only 17-18, a girl still.

So, to all people who repeat mindlessly that there was just a Diana hype, yet nothing behind it. Let me direct your thoughts to see a different perspective. How would you like if your 17 years old daugther (or niece or sister etc.) marries a 35 years old man, who cheats on her, uses her for breeding, him and his family totally control her every move, speach, choice of cloths, leisure activities. Who denies her love and affection, support in moments of hardships. Who humiliates her among their friends and families. And instead of encouraging her apparent PR skills, he is spiteful and resentful at her for being better liked than him.

For a 17 years old, or 26 years old, I think that such a treatment it is *extremely cruel*. If it was a daughter of mine, no kingly titles can seduce me to think that it was worth it. I feel that it is such a pity that in her fairly short life due to her position she wasn't able to cultivate and nurture a deeper and more serious love relationship. Thus I would attribute her engagement with people causes as a reflection of her hunger for love and appreciation, which were denied to her by her husband and her husband's family. And frankly I even admire her courage to find and explore venues for self-realization. She seemed to have good people skills, excellent sense of occasion and guts to take risks. If Charles was a smarter man or the royal family in general didn't have serious control issues, they could have actually majourly scored with Diana and not lose against Diana as they finally did...

Also from that conversation one can see how she echoes everything Charles says. Even when it contradicts her own statements (e.g. about missing him once every week). This is what she continues doing now - pulling Diana after Diana.
IP Logged as: 70.31.155.237 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1 Dated: 2006-03-27 14:33:56 Report This Comment

Name: Kathy Gebhardt Comment:
I agree that charles and Diana never should have married in the first place. She probably would have lived longer. Sure Diana cheated on charles, but she was in her 20's and her husband stopped touching her, so she looked for love elsewhere. Who can blame her. For those people who are going to start up the "Diana cheated first" tabloid fodder, please don't bother. I won't give that trash the time of day. I am glad camilla will have to endure Diana in the headlines and the nonsense of the comparisons. Sympathy is something that horrible woman will never get from me. I totally agree that people should remember Diana for her charity and humanity. Unfortunately though, the subject of her personal life, and what people 'think' they know about it, keeps coming up. I find it annoying. There are a lot of false truths about Diana out there. People believe garbage. It's unfortunate.
IP Logged as: 72.227.81.194 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Dated: 2006-03-25 19:30:42 Report This Comment

Name: Natalie Comment:
Diana and Charles' marriage was probably over before it began. I'm a Diana supporter but I can't ignore the fact that she cheated on Charles two. Marriage is a two way not one way. I sympathize with Camilla that everywhere she goes that she has the possibilty of being compared to Diana. Diana was beautiful and caring of her family and others. That is her legacy and that is what should be remembered not what happened between her, Charles and Camilla.
IP Logged as: 68.57.196.119 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Dated: 2006-03-25 14:14:14 Report This Comment

Name: Kathy Gebhardt Comment:
teri, camilla deserves a lifetime of misery. That's my opinion. You're first post was a personal attack on me. Not an opinion. The world knows what happened in that marriage. That is a fact. Everything about it was public knowledge. I didn't state anything in my original post that wasn't known long ago. Let's not continue this pointless arguement and move on...shall we?
IP Logged as: 72.227.81.194 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Dated: 2006-03-25 13:42:45 Report This Comment

Name: Sara Boyce Comment:
i would agree with posts! and also Steven's posts bravo!

but im sure about Camilla follow late Diana,Princess of Wales's footsteps if she would alives anytimes and Diana would hounded for sakes of Camilla's follow of her.

but im still fans of Princess Diana since she died in 1997 and im not huge fans of Camilla nobody!

its really unbelieve of front newspaper about that stories but im not sure about Prince William and Harry would more upset of his step-mother follow footstep of late his mother's i dont think so! but William and Harry wanted still leagcy of his mother's but i would agree with steven what he talking about it!

but Camilla would NEVER become Princess of Wales! if Diana would alive anytimes! i would get damn knew it but Camilla is Duchess of Cornwall! thumbsdown

many people in Egypt and lots of more in country who loves Princess Diana lots than Camilla because Camilla never tours before but Camilla is her first time but Diana have many times of her tours since her marriages to Prince Charles in 1981
IP Logged as: 68.51.18.169 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; YPC 3.0.3) Dated: 2006-03-25 06:50:10 Report This Comment

Name: Teri Comment:
You have no idea if I'm a Diana supporter or not, just like you have no idea of the real facts of what went on in that marriage. Its your opinion, and I'm stating that my opinion is that nobody deserves a bashing from complete strangers who think they know all. thumbsdown
IP Logged as: 58.162.236.14 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Dated: 2006-03-25 00:43:36 Report This Comment

Name: Kathy Gebhardt Comment:
sorry Teri, I beg to differ. The facts were in front of the eyes of the world. I don't know where you were at that time. It is not your place to judge my "kind" of support. This answer is also typical of a non Diana supporter...but that's okay too. I'm not here to criticize the opinions of others like you seem to be doing, I am here to state my opinions. The option to ignore them would be your call, but please don't tell me who deserves a bashing or whether or not my support is not the right kind. Do not use Diana to make a point. Like I said, it is not your place.
IP Logged as: 72.227.81.194 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Dated: 2006-03-24 14:24:22 Report This Comment

Name: Kathy Gebhardt Comment:
oops, sorry for the double post. I wasn't logged in the first time I posted, and I got an error and didn't think it was going to show up.happy-smiley
IP Logged as: 72.227.81.194 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Dated: 2006-03-24 14:17:57 Report This Comment

Name: Kathy Gebhardt Comment:
Public support doesn't matter. camilla will be queen if charles becomes king because that is what charles wants. It's all about charles. It's a charles world. Ask him, he'll tell you!
IP Logged as: 72.227.81.194 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Dated: 2006-03-24 12:44:01 Report This Comment

Name: Kathy Gebhardt Comment:
Public support doesn't matter. camilla will be queen if charles becomes king, because that's what charles wants. It's all about charles. It's a charles world. Ask him, he'll tell you!
IP Logged as: 72.227.81.194 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Dated: 2006-03-24 12:42:04 Report This Comment

Name: Teri Comment:
Kathy, you don't know "the facts" any more than anyone else. The only ones who do are Diana, Charles and their sons.

I don't think anyone DESERVES a bashing Kathy, and for all your protests about just stating your opinion, with respect, Diana really doesn't need your kind of support. thumbsdown
IP Logged as: 58.162.236.14 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Dated: 2006-03-24 11:58:36 Report This Comment

Name: M-M Comment:
You say we all know Camilla will never have public support Laura , how absurd is it then that Camilla will more than likely end up Queen Consort ?
How can she possibly comfort and uplift , even inspire the population when it's necessary , if she doesn't have public support ? happy-smiley
IP Logged as: 211.28.189.162 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Dated: 2006-03-24 04:33:38 Report This Comment

Name: shelley Comment:
Jane,
to coin the words of Oscar Wilde....
" My dear Jane, Oh my dear jane"!bigsmile-smiley

Absolute cobblers m'dear.

Shelley (a Brit)
IP Logged as: 205.250.207.161 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Dated: 2006-03-24 02:30:43 Report This Comment

Name: Kathy Gebhardt Comment:
If camilla didn't deserve bashing, I would imagine that nobody would bother doing it.
I'm sure someone will come in soon at some point and retaliate with a negative comment about Diana. Bashing Diana is the only thing people feel they can do to try and put camilla in a positive light. I see it all the time. Quite pathetic actually.
Thinking about anything remotely decent about camilla could wear a person out. Just my opinion of course. Personally speaking, I didn't think of what I wrote as bashing. I just told it like it was/is.
IP Logged as: 72.227.81.194 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Dated: 2006-03-24 01:22:55 Report This Comment

Name: NP Comment:
Camilla bashing as usual....oh surprising...
IP Logged as: 195.93.102.65 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; AOL 9.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705) Dated: 2006-03-23 22:57:29 Report This Comment

Name: Kathy Gebhardt Comment:
Hi Jane! I don't think superficial is the word I would use. I prefer to be someone who looked at both sides of the story and came out with the "facts" of what was done to Diana by these two people...charles and camilla...who decided that before they reached their eternal bliss, while going through their "tragic love story" [sorry, but gag me], that they would ruin a few peoples lives on the way to being together in their tamponious love. Whatever love means.Never on the planet has there been two more self-centered people than charles and camilla. They are suited for each other. They are both horrid. It is amazing that you actually believe that camilla "re-entered" the picture. She never LEFT the picture. That was the problem. There was a point in time when charles did care for Diana, and in seeing this, camilla, the determined manipulative witch that she is, made sure it wasn't going to last. charles was easy to manipulate. He is weak. You see, camilla picked Diana out for charles...figuring she and charles could continue their own agenda, while Diana was the stupid young wife who she thought would put up with it. Yes, "discreet" cammie was after what was Diana's right from the start. I hope she is miserable forever now that she has what she worked so hard for.As far as Harry goes...what was he going to say publically when asked about camilla? "Oh, she's a slag and I hate her" Of course not. I am a realist. I was around during the late 80's/early 90's. I saw what happened. charles' wife asked him to give up his mistress. He refused. End of story. Charles never tried to work anything out. After Harry was born, he was done with Diana. She had done her bit as a royal incubator, so as far as he was concerned his marriage was over. Like his lovely sister Anne said at the horrible prospect of his having to sleep with his wife "close your eyes and think of England" How intelligent....how non human...how Windsorly.
IP Logged as: 72.227.81.194 HomePage: http://www.dianathepeoplesprincess.com/ Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Dated: 2006-03-23 18:11:18 Report This Comment

Name: Lisa Comment:
How dare anyone tell ANYONE else here HOW or WHAT to feel! If someone is posting their OPINION and you don't like it- ignore it. No one who loves Diana is ORDERING people to love her or dislike CPB- they are posting THEIR own comments. And how DARE you insinuate that it is only Americans posting here and that we are all "superficial"- many posters are from Australia and Britain. If people don't conform to your way of thinking, that is just too bad. I have been to many boards online that are loaded with wackos that say sick things and delibrately take the opposite side of the argument(whichever the argument happens to be about) just to "troll". Know what? I don't go to those places any more. There is no point. So, "stop being so superficial"? STOP TELLING US WHAT TO THINK!
IP Logged as: 71.1.236.187 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Dated: 2006-03-23 16:51:04 Report This Comment

Name: Jane Comment:
So often Americans are regarded as being so superfical. Had Diana not been so young and attractive would the attetion have been the same. A women marries a man she hardly knows (Diana herself said they had what 13 "dates"), She's moody and hard to deal with (her brother, her "rock",her mother,her employees,Elton John etc..) She was star struck (invites models to meet her teenage son, dances on stage, poses for Vogue etc...) Confides her problems with her child...it's your child what burden does that place on them??? Charles tried, he has been honest, Diana confirmed that Camilla re-entered the picture years after the marriage. Your a man who is tring to do the right thing and you end up with a women who is self-absorbed, irrational and vendictive. What man in his right mind would even try as long as Charles did? Prince Harry the baby the one who has felt so much pain even said cut her some slack. Look at the facts. Charles loves Camilla. Every source says Camilla is a warm nice person. Stop being so superficial.
IP Logged as: 64.12.117.5 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; AOL 9.0; Windows NT 5.1; FunWebProducts; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Dated: 2006-03-23 15:49:01 Report This Comment

Name: Laura Comment:
'Camilla will never be Diana.'

Quite true. But then again, what makes people think that Camilla wants to be Diana? Just because she wears an outfit that she needed to on religious grounds it doesn't mean she did it to emulate Diana.

Camilla and Diana are two vastly different women. Camilla had nothing in common with Diana. So why would she want to be her?

I also think Camilla is well aware she won't have a 'fan base' like Diana did. I dont think it bothers her much either. I think Charles is the one who makes the fuss over that.
IP Logged as: 62.255.64.7 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Dated: 2006-03-23 14:11:40 Report This Comment

Name: Steven Comment:
As someone who has experienced their parent’s marriage break up, have their father run off with his mistress and have their mother pass away, I feel very sorry for Prince’s William and Harry. The world is the way it is, and no amount of comparison to anyone, either dead or alive, will change the present! I think it is time to let Diana rest in peace, the press hounded her, her entire life and now they do the same in her death, cashing in.

Life is not fair and in a perfect world, Camilla wouldn’t be able to step into someone else’s world, but that’s the way it is. So why don’t we let them get on with it!
IP Logged as: 81.77.104.229 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; iebar; (enigma123); FreeprodTB; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Dated: 2006-03-23 12:06:31 Report This Comment

Name: Kathy Comment:
I think that the world knows that Camilla cannot hold a candle to the lovely, compassionate, and spiritual Diana. Of course there will always be comparisons between Camilla and Diana and Diana will always be the one to come out on top, because Diana's love for the people of the world emanated from her eyes where'as Camilla has only ever cared about herself. I am afraid she is reaping what she has sown.happy-smiley
IP Logged as: 62.30.124.14 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.1) Dated: 2006-03-23 11:01:09 Report This Comment

Name: Rhenae Comment:
I am so glad that this is happening. Camilla will NEVER be Diana and she will NEVER have the fan base that Diana has. Diana will always haunt the two of them in everything that they do. I am also happy with how the reporters are still honoring Diana. I will not read anything on Camilla. I don't care how many people have changed their minds about her cause I will never be a Camilla fan.
IP Logged as: 209.34.8.8 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; FunWebProducts; MSN 6.1; MSNbMSFT; MSNmen-us; MSNc0z; MSNc00) Dated: 2006-03-23 09:23:32 Report This Comment

Name: M-M Comment:
Since Camilla has so often copied Diana's appearance and dress , she can only expect comparisons to be made . And she will always come out the loser .

She has to be content with having Diana's husband and position , she can never have her beauty or style .
IP Logged as: 211.28.189.162 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Dated: 2006-03-23 06:57:18 Report This Comment

Name: Teri Comment:
Oh, get over your spite already. The media are playing comparisons to sell their papers to the gullible. If Camilla hadn't been respectful to her hosts and worn something else then that would have been the spin. Diana is dead, Charles and Camilla are married, the world moves on. thumbsdown
IP Logged as: 58.162.236.14 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Dated: 2006-03-23 00:07:58 Report This Comment

Name: Trudie Comment:
Camilla will always be compared to Diana notice that the outfit is similar to the one Diana wore in Saudi Arabia but Diana pulled it off better since she was younger and as Camilla will undoubtly tour the same countries Diana toured with Charles her ghost will never leave. Now Camilla's marriage has three hey Cam is it a bit crowded?
IP Logged as: 69.120.236.243 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Dated: 2006-03-22 22:14:51 Report This Comment

Name: Tabitha Comment:
thumbsup I am glad the news is comparing Camilla to Diana. Yes, Diana was a whole lot more than Camilla will ever be. She should have won the spouse of the year. After all, she spent all those years trying to hold on to her husband all the while he was running to Camilla!!

So to all the reporters out there keep up the good work!! By reporting things about Diana along with Camilla they will sell their stories. I would not pick up a paper/magazine if it were only about Camilla and Charles but, add Diana and I will break my piggy bank to get it!
IP Logged as: 70.233.195.172 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; FunWebProducts; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Dated: 2006-03-22 21:59:35 Report This Comment

Name: Dee-Dee Comment:
"Haunted by the ghost of Diana" whatever,Diana is not haunting them, it's the press who are haunting them by bringing her up every five minutes. I am a Diana fan, but I also feel that it's time to let her rest once and for all.
IP Logged as: 129.252.190.1 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Dated: 2006-03-22 21:32:00 Report This Comment

Name: Tracey Comment:
Actually, I don't think many of the other royal wives are compared to Diana, maybe Sophie, because she bares a resemblance to Diana because she has a hairstyle similar to that of Diana's. No, Camilla is compared because of her role in Diana's life. She was a constant in Diana's life so it is only fitting that Diana be a constant in Camillia's. What is more interesting is that the last wife to usurp the Prince of Wales (in his eyes) when making speeches was Diana, and we all know how she was treated, will the same happen to Camilla or will it still all somehow be Diana's fault.
IP Logged as: 210.10.151.52 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Dated: 2006-03-22 20:51:58 Report This Comment

Name: Lisa Comment:
I agree that all newer members and members to come will be compared with Diana, as the papers are trying to recoup their lost revenue since Diana's death. Let's not pretend this article is anything but between Charles' wife and her replacement. Had he married ANYONE except the woman he cheated on Diana with, the media would not be so quick to compare them, especially visually. They both got what they wanted so I doubt they mind the comparisons(hehehehe!).
IP Logged as: 71.1.236.187 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Dated: 2006-03-22 20:27:52 Report This Comment

Name: Tracey Comment:
Kathy Gebhardt and Lisa said it well, Camilla has no one to blame but herself, she coveted everthing Diana had, well she can now live with the comparsions.
IP Logged as: 210.10.151.52 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Dated: 2006-03-22 20:14:39 Report This Comment

Name: Kate - NOTL Comment:
I think that is type of headline looks good on camilla, and charles. There are now still 3 in charle's marriage, again... I hope camilla is a bit uncomfortable.
As for comparing Diana and the other Royals, e.g. Sophie, Zara etc.... I don't see anything to compare. They are each their own individuals... There will always be comparisons to camilla - this is the woman who ran interference in Diana's marriage from prior to the wedding...until the day of the divorce... thumbsupthumbsup
IP Logged as: 24.150.88.5 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Dated: 2006-03-22 18:26:55 Report This Comment

Name: Laura Burley Comment:
As a lifelong Diana fan, even I get truly annoyed with Diana being the yardstick and everyone being judged on how they measure up.

I think Sophie - and others - have their own qualities. Comparing them to someone who, sadly, died nearly nine years ago is pointless.
IP Logged as: 62.255.64.7 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Dated: 2006-03-22 16:34:32 Report This Comment

Name: jj Comment:
Is anyone truly interested in comparisons between Diana and the rest of the royal women!?

They are all individuals each with their own strengths and weaknesses.
IP Logged as: 195.93.21.102 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; AOL 9.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Dated: 2006-03-22 16:29:54 Report This Comment

Name: Laura Comment:
But putting Camilla aside everyone get's compared to Diana. Whether it be Sophie Wessex or, even, quite unfairly, Kate Middleton. Is every royal woman going to be compared to Diana? As many people say there will never be another Diana. So why do people and the press try to compare her with everyone. What's wrong with letting these royal women be themselves, and at the same time remember Diana as the special non-replaceable person she was.
IP Logged as: 62.255.64.7 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Dated: 2006-03-22 16:00:25 Report This Comment

Name: shelley Comment:
Laura,
that is what happens when you step into a dead woman's shoes, or in this case a dead woman's entire life.
Shelley
IP Logged as: 205.250.207.161 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Dated: 2006-03-22 14:41:07 Report This Comment

Name: Lisa Comment:
I guess cammy is finding out what it means to have three people in her marriage! Good!
IP Logged as: 71.1.236.187 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Dated: 2006-03-22 14:39:49 Report This Comment

Name: Kathy Gebhardt Comment:
There is no comparison between Diana and camilla. Diana was one of a kind. Camilla is, well, one too many.
IP Logged as: 72.227.81.194 HomePage: http://www.dianathepeoplesprincess.com/ Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Dated: 2006-03-22 14:01:50 Report This Comment

Name: Laura Comment:
It's understandable that their would be plenty of comparisons between Camilla and Diana during this tour, but, for me, it's really annoying.

Yes, Camilla is going shoeless and yes she has to wear a headscarf. But, if Sophie or Fergie visited they would have to as well. It's tradition and expected from a lady visiter. I just wish the comparrisons would stop.

Camilla is much older then Diana, and will never have public support. We all know that. So comparison's are pretty redundent in this instance, and I hate the media for winding things up like this. Can't they just concentrate on the tour?
IP Logged as: 62.255.64.7 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Dated: 2006-03-22 13:48:27 Report This Comment

 
< Prev   Next >

Videos

Quick Links

Word

Trust

Senebale

More Web Links


Syndicate