Menu Content/Inhalt
Home arrow News arrow Latest arrow Poll: Growing Support For King Charles But A Thumbs Down to Queen Camilla





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Latest Puzzles








iPing-it!

Webfeed (RSS/ATOM/RDF) registered at http://www.feeds4all.com

British Blog Directory.

Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service.

 

Poll: Growing Support For King Charles But A Thumbs Down to Queen Camilla PDF Print E-mail
Written by Joanne Leyland   
Wednesday, 05 April 2006
A new poll released today suggests there is growing support for a King Charles but the reaction to a possible 'Queen Camilla' isn't quite so positive.

The Times survey, in which a sample of
1,503 adults over 18 were surveyed, shows that a majority of people wish Prince William to succeed to the throne instead of his father, the Prince of Wales. However, whilst William leads with 39% — the very same result as a 2005 poll — Prince Charles has seen a 6% rise in support for his succession to the throne, with 37% wanting him to be King.

However, of most concern must be the lack of rise in support for the Charles and Camilla union. An overwhelming majority of 64% say they don't care...surely a worrying result considering this couple are in line to be 'the future' (for however long or short Charles's reign) of the monarchy? This is also despite the much higher public profile enjoyed by Camilla, especially in recent weeks during her three nation tour with the Prince.

Just 21% want to see a 'Queen Camilla', with 56% supporting the former Mrs Parker Bowles being known as the officially acknowledged title of Princess Consort on her husband's accession to the throne.

Camilla continues to face most opposition from women who likely continue to feel an allegiance to Diana, Princess of Wales.

The new poll reveals that 60% of women are against Camilla becoming Queen. In comparison, 53% of men are against a Queen Camilla.

In response to the findings of The Times/Populus poll, respected constitutional historian David Starkey told the newspaper: "There is no great hostility, a little bit of enthusiasm. The monarchy is the ancestor of New Labour {PM Tony Blair's political party}. It had an unbelievably powerful populist narrative for much of the 20th century as this model family, which carried all before them. The Queen is acting as a symbol for continuity, but no one knows what she is continuous with."

"People, by and large, have come to the conclusion that Charles is trying and the fact that he has shown himself to be a good father in the Diana mould has softened opinion towards him. However odd some of his interventions in public life may appear, they have turned out to be quite sensible and they are all well intentioned...public opinion is warming to Camilla as a woman. Yet for a significant proportion of women the Diana factor is an unbridgeable gulf. I happen to think they are mad for thinking that."
 

Comment on this article
Leave your comments (Show/Hide Form)
Other Visitors Comments

Name: Teri Comment:
"Yes, but the people LIKED Queen Mary.."

Not at first, she was considered staid, dull and unfashionable by many of her contemporaries. Her popularity increased only over the years, particularly after WW1. It will be interesting to see how Camilla is viewed in a couple of years. happy-smiley
IP Logged as: 58.162.236.14 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Dated: 2006-04-08 06:04:23 Report This Comment

Name: Tracey Comment:
But Julian, Camilla was quite happy for Diana to be grossly unhappy about her having an illict affair with Charles. Why is Camilla's happiness more important. It is starting to reek a little of double standards here.
IP Logged as: 210.10.167.248 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Dated: 2006-04-07 22:27:39 Report This Comment

Name: Lisa Comment:
Yes, but the people LIKED Queen Mary. CPB? No.happy-smiley
IP Logged as: 71.1.236.187 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Dated: 2006-04-07 12:39:01 Report This Comment

Name: Teri Comment:
There are many historical precedents plus other reasons why people may prefer a particular title. Queen Mary took the title of Queen Consort rather than just Queen for example. Life ain't so black and white for some of us Lisa! laughing-smiley
IP Logged as: 58.162.236.14 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Dated: 2006-04-06 23:49:46 Report This Comment

Name: Julian Alfred Comment:
Nobody will win until Chaz/Cam die or reign.
Let's people decide if they want Queen Camilla. A
referendum that clarifies citizen preferences is
valid. The majority wins. Nobody deserves to live
unhappy. Why should subjects be forced upon something they don't want (See Chaz example).
IP Logged as: 68.87.77.185 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Dated: 2006-04-06 19:40:42 Report This Comment

Name: Lisa Comment:
Hmmm, 60% do not want her to have the title of Queen and you are still wondering if that also means that they actively dislike her???? Hello!
IP Logged as: 71.1.236.187 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Dated: 2006-04-06 17:12:01 Report This Comment

Name: Teri Comment:
Actually, the poll stated "Overall, 64 percent of people questioned said they did not care either way about the union." This indicates that 64% of the people polled had no strong negative or positive opinions on Charles and Camilla. This need not be interpreted as bad news for the future King and Queen. As David Starkey said, there is no great hostility towards them, and if they continue to work on behalf of Britain then they may very well build up the positive opinions even more.

Also, the poll only indicates that 60% of women would prefer Camilla not to take the title of Queen, but is not clear on if this percentage polled actively dislike her.

happy-smiley
IP Logged as: 58.162.236.14 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Dated: 2006-04-06 00:17:54 Report This Comment

Name: Jacqueline Comment:
I say why can't we all just move on....the milk is spilt and it can't be put back in the jug...(ie Charles and Camilla are married)....just be glad you don't have to come home to Charles every night...I say let's leave Camilla to her "prize"..and get on with life...
IP Logged as: 206.218.141.2 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Dated: 2006-04-05 20:49:25 Report This Comment

Name: jj Comment:
Well we had the possibility of two adulteresses as future Queen. One makes the future king happy the other didn't. So I'd choose the one that makes him happy. A happy king will ultimately be a better king.
IP Logged as: 195.93.21.102 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; AOL 9.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) Dated: 2006-04-05 17:02:32 Report This Comment

Name: Ontarian Comment:
I don't see what all the fuss is about. HRH may go by HRH The Duchess of Cornwall, but she *IS* HRH the Princess of Wales. Some of you may say, "She'll NEVER be Princess of Wales." But, the reality is that she IS! Get over it. Similarly Lady Louise Windsor *IS* HRH Princess Louise of Wessex, but her parents have chosen for her to use a lesser title. Camilla WILL legally be Queen, but may choose the title of "Princess Consort." The situation will be EXACTLY the same as it is now.
IP Logged as: 134.117.157.150 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; Rogers Hi-Speed Internet; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Dated: 2006-04-05 16:58:39 Report This Comment

Name: Mrs Coombs Comment:
The reality of the situation is that the ONLY WAY Camilla will not become queen is IF Charles doesn't become king. And that would be music to my, and millions of other Brits, ears, not to mention lighten our hearts!
IP Logged as: 71.131.232.28 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; yplus 3.01) Dated: 2006-04-05 16:38:32 Report This Comment

Name: Kate Comment:
Perhaps it is just a case of "you can fool some of the people some of the time , but not all the people all of the time".

May she never reign!!! She is NOT Queen material. She should have kept her position as mistress and companion. That is where she fits in.
IP Logged as: 24.150.88.5 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Dated: 2006-04-05 15:47:19 Report This Comment

Name: Julia Comment:
I guess that no one realizes that whether Camilla is called princess or queen, she WILL be Queen in every way once Charles becomes King. Regardless of what people think of Diana, how can anyone actually look at Camilla and not see the manipulative social climber she actually is?

Do the British people actually want someone of such low moral standards representing them on the world stage?

Albeit, Queen Camilla or Princess Camilla, she will enjoy the same status as the Queen Mother. This is what I find the most troubling.
IP Logged as: 150.148.0.27 HomePage: http:// Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Dated: 2006-04-05 15:26:40 Report This Comment

 
< Prev   Next >