Menu Content/Inhalt
Home arrow Articles arrow Diana: A Picture That Asks A Thousand Questions





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Latest Puzzles








iPing-it!

Webfeed (RSS/ATOM/RDF) registered at http://www.feeds4all.com

British Blog Directory.

Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service.

 

Diana: A Picture That Asks A Thousand Questions PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Wednesday, 19 July 2006


It was (and still is) an enormous show of restraint that the press has held back from purchasing these pictures to sell them on to the public. A restraint no doubt helped by the fact that these pictures can be considered police evidence and the fact Diana was one of the most famous and publicly loved people of the 20th Century, a world figure who continues to enjoy a huge following and loyal support to this day.

Even the blurriest images of the late Princess could be sold for thousands of dollars. This "last pic" of Diana has the potential of being a million-dollar sale....that is if people choose to buy publications showing the pictures.

And clearly there is a market: just hours after the storm broke, copies of Chi magazine were being sold on eBay for around ten times the cover price, until the auction house bowed to criticism and removed the offending publication from sale.



Umberto Brindani, who under Italian privacy laws may be facing fines or even jail for publishing the image, continues to argue that he believes the pictures are not offensive. In his view, the photograph is "touching" and "tender" and looks merely like a beautiful woman sleeping.

That is one man’s opinion.

The harsh reality is Diana isn’t sleeping. She’s bleeding internally and close to death —  a death that would shock the world and devastate many, many people, not least the Princess's sons.

But if the appearance of Diana in these pictures isn’t the cause of the outcry, what is?

Could it be that it is what cannot been seen in the pictures which make them so scandalous?  Is it the fact that we know she is surrounded by the paparazzi who (legally acknowledged or not) played a part in the crash? The knowledge that not one of these photographers offered the victims assistance, choosing instead to relentlessy photograph the inhabitants?



Is it knowing that, had the ambulance rushed to the hospital, one of Britain's greatest ambassadors may have been saved? Is it the discomforting knowledge that we, the public, played a part in her failure to ever find the privacy which, as she herself said, had been "so lacking" for over 16 years of her life? The fact that we continue to disrespect her privacy even in death?



 
< Prev   Next >